Jonathon Yaniv is a Canadian transgender who now goes by the name Jessica Simpson. He/she is decidedly masculine in appearance, grossly overweight, still endowed with a penis, and clearly intent on trying to profit from his/her status as an “oppressed minority.” Having sought a Brazilian waxing from over a dozen B. C. beauty salons known to cater only to biological Females, Yaniv took his case to B. C.’s Human Rights Tribunal when they refused to wax his male genitalia. In Oct. of 2019, the tribunal ruled that the salons had in fact done nothing wrong and that Yaniv was clearly motivated by a lust for personal profit. It was the same urge, no doubt, that led this conspicuously unattractive person to seek admission to an Ontario Women’s beauty pageant, also in 2019. Rejected when it was discovered that he still had a penis, he predictably sued the pageant for $10,000 in damages.
As reported by Drea Humphrey on Jan. 22, Yaniv has unsuccessfully sued The Rebel news network several times, each one costing it thousands in legal fees. As a purveyor of rational, “conservative,” political commentary, The Rebel has of course taken exception to the simplistic Trans notion that an individual with a penis who says he’s now a Woman, automatically becomes one. Humphrey, by the way, is a lovely, intelligent, Black woman. Her Jan. 22 post featured video evidence of Yaniv’s angry response to her, screaming “Nigger, Nigger, Nigger. Fuck you!” as she sought to question him about his agenda.
The moral degeneracy of Yaniv’s character begs a very basic question. Is the Leftist narrative of Oppression a valid lens through which to view the issue of Social Injustice, or are those claiming to be the victims of such often no more than resentful hypocrites seeking to profit from the Left’s simplistic world-view? How many, one wonders, of the tens of thousands of B.L.M. advocates who destroyed over 2 billion dollars of American property in 2021, were no more than slothful, self-indulgent non-achievers who took a perverse joy in taking vengeance on those who had in fact achieved?
My point is that the sacred DEI agenda of the Left, which defines social injustice strictly in terms of race, gender, sexual orientation, etc., is laughably superficial in that it ignores the actual moral/intellectual status of those it so passionately defends. Jonathan Yaniv is an obnoxious, self-centered jerk whose various lawsuits ought to have been instantly dismissed with no cost whatsoever to his innocent targets. His most recent attack on The Rebel, launched through B.C.’s Human Rights Tribunal, immediately cost her network, according to Humphrey, 10,000 dollars in legal fees, money which it can ill afford. The Tribunal, of course, is naturally sympathetic to those claiming their “human rights” to be under attack. But surely it must know by now that Yaniv is a trouble maker motivated by greed and resentment. Surely it must know that it is his targets [ B.C.’s aestheticians?] whose civil rights are under attack!
While I rarely watch the mainstream news here in Canada, I would assume it has included few if any glowing endorsements of Yaniv’s “social justice crusade.” That would be too ridiculous. But at the same time he is allowed to continue in his obnoxious, hate-filled, self-serving antics. How, one wonders, would B.C.’s Human Rights Tribunal react to a White, Straight, Male lodging lawsuit after lawsuit against various businesses and institutions which, in their devotion to D.E.I., had failed to hire him simply because he was neither Black or Gay or Female? Would he not be submitted to relentless, excoriating abuse from the Left and its media minions? Indeed might he not be behind bars for his “hateful” antics?
Yaniv’s immunity from prosecution is but one example of the absurd double standard with which “conservatives” must deal on a daily basis.